Archive

Understanding Unintended Consequences and Health Information Technology:

Journal: IMIA Yearbook
ISSN: 0943-4747
Topic:

Unintended Consequences: New Problems and New Solutions

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-027
Issue: 2016: IMIA Yearbook 2016
Pages: 53-60

Understanding Unintended Consequences and Health Information Technology:

Contribution from the IMIA Organizational and Social Issues Working Group

Special Section: Unintended Consequences: New Problems and New Solutions

Working Group Contributions

C. E. Kuziemsky (1), R. Randell (2), E. M. Borycki (3)

(1) Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; (2) School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; (3) School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

Keywords

organizational, social, Health information technology, unintended consequences

Summary

Objective: No framework exists to identify and study unintended consequences (UICs) with a focus on organizational and social issues (OSIs). To address this shortcoming, we conducted a literature review to develop a framework for considering UICs and health information technology (HIT) from the perspective of OSIs. Methods: A literature review was conducted for the period 2000- 2015 using the search terms “unintended consequences” and “health information technology”. 67 papers were screened, of which 18 met inclusion criteria. Data extraction was focused on the types of technologies studied, types of UICs identified, and methods of data collection and analysis used. A thematic analysis was used to identify themes related to UICs. Results: We identified two overarching themes. One was the definition and terminology of how people classify and discuss UICs. Second was OSIs and UICs. For the OSI theme, we also identified four sub-themes: process change and evolution, individual-collaborative interchange, context of use, and approaches to model, study, and understand UICs. Conclusions: While there is a wide body of research on UICs, there is a lack of overall consensus on how they should be classified and reported, limiting our ability to understand the implications of UICs and how to manage them. More mixed-methods research and better proactive identification of UICs remain priorities. Our findings and framework of OSI considerations for studying UICs and HIT extend existing work on HIT and UICs by focusing on organizational and social issues.

You may also be interested in...

1.

B. Kaplan (1), N. T. Shaw (2)

Methods Inf Med 2004 43 3: 215-231

2.

Special Section: Unintended Consequences: New Problems and New Solutions

Survey

K. Zheng (1), J. Abraham (2), L. L. Novak (3), T. L. Reynolds (4), A. Gettinger (5)

Yearb Med Inform 2016 : 13-29

https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-036

3.
The Current Use of Frameworks and Models from the Biomedical and Life Sciences Literatures

Original Article

E. M. Borycki (1), A. W. Kushniruk (1), P. Bellwood (1), J. Brender (2)

Methods Inf Med 2012 51 2: 95-103

https://doi.org/10.3414/ME11-02-0009